Research Monitor
Publication Database for Development Research

2019/03 – Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath (CDS); book; Author(s): James Copestake et al.
Details for “Attributing Development Impact: The Qualitative Impact Protocol (QuIP) Case Book”

2017/11 – Oxfam GB; Effectiveness Reviews; Author(s): Robert Fuller
Details for “Measuring Impact: A Meta-Analysis of Oxfam’s Livelihoods Effectiveness Reviews”

2017/03 – Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (Noragric); Third World Quarterly 2017; Author(s): Esben Leifsen, Luis Sánchez-Vázquez and Maleny Gabriela Reyes
Details for “Claiming Prior Consultation, Monitoring Environmental Impact: Counterwork by the Use of Formal Instruments of Participatory Governance in Ecuador ’S Emerging Mining Sector”
Noragric

2016/12 – Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp (IOB); Discussion paper 2016.02; Author(s): Saudia Rahat and Nathalie Holvoet
Details for “Diagnosing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for Climate Change Programs – Case Study of the Caribbean’s Climate Change Program”

2016/11 – International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED); Working Paper; Author(s): Marissa van Epp, Ben Garside
Details for “Solving ‘Wicked’ Problems: Can Social Learning Catalyse Adaptive Responses to Climate Change?”

2015/11 – Institut du développement durable et des relations internationales (IDDRI); Working Paper No. 14/15; Author(s): Pía Zevallos; et al.
Details for “Monitoring Decarbonization and Resilience in Latin America and the Caribbean”

2017/10 – Oxfam GB; Research report; Author(s): Rob Fuller, Jonathan Lain
Details for “Building Resilience: A Meta-Analysis of Oxfam’s Resilience Effectiveness Reviews”

2017/08 – Oxfam GB; Evaluation report; Author(s): Suzanne Ferron
Details for “Enabling Access to Non-Food Items in an Emergency Response: A Review of Oxfam Programmes”

2016/02 – Oxfam GB; Research report; Author(s): Reeves, Aimee
Details for “Understanding the Effectiveness of Agricultural Training for Women: A Desk Review of Indicators Methods and Best Practices”