EADI/ISS Work in Progress Webinar: China, the EU, and Western aid norms. A case study on Ethiopia, 22 June, 14.00 CET
The paper presented is:
China, the EU, and Western aid norms. A case study on Ethiopia
by Mario Esteban and Iliana Olivié
Register here
The aim of this seminar is to provide an arena for ECR/PhD students to receive feedback on their work. The cancellation (for obvious reasons) of various conferences has deprived them of this important feedback element. We invite colleagues to join and participate in the spirit of providing constructive and supportive feedback. If you are interested in presenting please contact the organisers.
Work in Progress Seminar: The EU as a development actor EADI Working Group
China, the EU, and Western aid norms. A case study on Ethiopia
Mario Esteban and Iliana Olivié
The irruption of China in the world scene has been extensively analyzed by academic literature. As for its specific role as a donor and partner to other South countries, a vivid debate has been held on as to what extent China behaves as a ‘rogue donor’ –a predator, particularly in Africa, in search for cheap natural resources in exchange for tied aid– or as a peer partner, with no colonial past –unlike several DAC donors– that liaise with other developing countries on the grounds of horizontality and no interference in domestic affairs.
This is a somehow normative debate: ‘good’ donors follow rules on aid that are pre-established by the international community while ‘bad’ donors elude those norms and shape their own international assistance in accordance with their national political and/or economic interests.
Taking this normative starting point, a relevant question arises which is to what extent China is accepting, rejecting or shaping pre-existing norms in the field of development cooperation. Addressing this general question requires a precise definition of such norms. As our aim is to explore to what extent the East cooperates or fights the West and, more precisely, the EU, in this domain, aid norms should be defined following Western standards. The Aid Effectiveness Agenda (AEA) could be defined as Western and European; something that can be explained in its origin –under a clear North-South pattern of aid relations– and tracked, for instance, in its strong liberal footprint –see, for instance, the importance of the democratic principle or the orientation to results, rather than political processes–.
If the AEA is a sensible arena for exploring cooperation and/or conflict between EU donors and China, the above mentioned general question could be reframed in three more specific questions: (i) Does China accept (follow), rejects (ignore) or re-shapes the AEA?; (ii) Have EU donors changed their attitude as a result of the appearance of China as a relevant donor?; (iii) Has China’s behavior regarding AEA changed as a result of its interaction with Western donors?
The aim of this proposal is to explore these questions through the particular case of a ‘development encounter’ between China and the community of Western traditional donors, with a focus on EU donors. We have chosen Ethiopia for this encounter: an aid darling with a strong presence of China in aid as well as in other fields and a varied presence of traditional donors.
We observe the behavior of donors towards aid effectiveness principles –ownership, inclusive partnership, transparency and accountability, and focus on results–. We aim at assessing to what extent China accepts, rejects or shapes these two principles and whether EU donors’ and China’s behavior regarding these principles has evolved as a result of the co-existence of these two types of donors.
This work is structured as follows. The first section addresses the methodological aspects of our research: we explain (i) the rationale for selecting the AEA as an example of EU aid norms; (ii) our research techniques; and (iii) the features that make Ethiopia a most likely case. In section two, we show our results. Last section concludes.
Event Calendar
- 2021
- February 2021 (1 entry)
- January 2021 (1 entry)
- 2020
- November 2020 (4 entries)
- October 2020 (4 entries)
- September 2020 (2 entries)
- August 2020 (1 entry)
- July 2020 (3 entries)
- June 2020 (6 entries)
- May 2020 (1 entry)
- April 2020 (2 entries)
- February 2020 (1 entry)
- January 2020 (2 entries)
- 2019
- December 2019 (2 entries)
- November 2019 (2 entries)
- October 2019 (4 entries)
- September 2019 (2 entries)
- July 2019 (1 entry)
- May 2019 (3 entries)
- April 2019 (1 entry)
- March 2019 (2 entries)
- February 2019 (1 entry)
- 2018
- December 2018 (1 entry)
- November 2018 (4 entries)
- October 2018 (5 entries)
- September 2018 (5 entries)
- August 2018 (1 entry)
- June 2018 (2 entries)
- May 2018 (2 entries)
- 2017
- November 2017 (1 entry)
- August 2017 (1 entry)
- June 2017 (1 entry)
- February 2017 (1 entry)
- 2016
- November 2016 (1 entry)
- September 2016 (1 entry)
- June 2016 (2 entries)
- May 2016 (1 entry)
- April 2016 (1 entry)
- 2015
- December 2015 (1 entry)
- November 2015 (4 entries)
- October 2015 (1 entry)
- September 2015 (2 entries)
- May 2015 (1 entry)
- March 2015 (1 entry)
- February 2015 (2 entries)
- 2014
- November 2014 (2 entries)
- October 2014 (1 entry)
- August 2014 (1 entry)
- June 2014 (2 entries)
- 2013
- June 2013 (1 entry)
- 2012
- June 2012 (1 entry)
- 2010
- June 2010 (1 entry)
- 2009
- June 2009 (1 entry)
- 2008
- June 2008 (1 entry)
- 2005
- September 2005 (1 entry)
- 2004
- September 2004 (1 entry)
- 2003
- August 2003 (1 entry)